Joined
·
8,329 Posts
I'm looking at some commercial property for office/warehouse use.
I just looked at a lease and the guy wants to be indemnified from "any and all liability, actions, claims and damages" arising after I move in. That sounds pretty oppressive. So let's say the roof caves in because he failed to maintain it or Jerry rigged it in place of proper maintenance, He's not responsible for my injuries or any one else's? I don't freaking think so.
He also has a clause that says I'm required to maintain $800,000.00 worth of personal injury insurance as well as $500,000.00 worth of property damage insurance as part of a public liability policy THAT I MUST PAY FOR?!?!?
I'm no real estate guru, but that is usually the property owner's responsibility not the tenant's. I wouldn't have had a problem with the insurance being my burden to bear if he had just said that in the first place. Instead he says "the rent is $***X per month including utilities". He didn't mention that I would be responsible for a paying an expensive insurance policy on top of that. That sounds like classic bait and switch tactic. I can't stand that crap. Don't tell me the rent is "X" and then try and slide all kinds of hidden costs in right in the middle of the lease. That's some sleazy stuff in you ask me or am I off base here?
I just looked at a lease and the guy wants to be indemnified from "any and all liability, actions, claims and damages" arising after I move in. That sounds pretty oppressive. So let's say the roof caves in because he failed to maintain it or Jerry rigged it in place of proper maintenance, He's not responsible for my injuries or any one else's? I don't freaking think so.
He also has a clause that says I'm required to maintain $800,000.00 worth of personal injury insurance as well as $500,000.00 worth of property damage insurance as part of a public liability policy THAT I MUST PAY FOR?!?!?
I'm no real estate guru, but that is usually the property owner's responsibility not the tenant's. I wouldn't have had a problem with the insurance being my burden to bear if he had just said that in the first place. Instead he says "the rent is $***X per month including utilities". He didn't mention that I would be responsible for a paying an expensive insurance policy on top of that. That sounds like classic bait and switch tactic. I can't stand that crap. Don't tell me the rent is "X" and then try and slide all kinds of hidden costs in right in the middle of the lease. That's some sleazy stuff in you ask me or am I off base here?