New here
We are replacing a failed 3" inlet gate valve and RPZ backflow assembly. Incoming fixed at 110PSID. Please see photos.
Situation: Just after the last gate valve is a transition to "3" Socket Flange PVC Sch 80" and immediate SCH 80 elbow. After 20' rise there are two quick elbows. Existing SCH 80 is 20 years old. We are concerned about potential thrust on these elbows. Our solution is stay ductile for the first elbow and add flanged restraints, then replace existing high elbows with new SCH 80 elbows.
Question: A couple guys here want to eliminate the upper SCH 80 elbows completely, and solve with 45s. Would 45s actually reduce thrust effect potential? Or, is replacing with new SCH 80 elbows cautious enough? Thanks.
We are replacing a failed 3" inlet gate valve and RPZ backflow assembly. Incoming fixed at 110PSID. Please see photos.
Situation: Just after the last gate valve is a transition to "3" Socket Flange PVC Sch 80" and immediate SCH 80 elbow. After 20' rise there are two quick elbows. Existing SCH 80 is 20 years old. We are concerned about potential thrust on these elbows. Our solution is stay ductile for the first elbow and add flanged restraints, then replace existing high elbows with new SCH 80 elbows.
Question: A couple guys here want to eliminate the upper SCH 80 elbows completely, and solve with 45s. Would 45s actually reduce thrust effect potential? Or, is replacing with new SCH 80 elbows cautious enough? Thanks.